Skip to Main Content

Guidelines for Effective Communication in Schools

The Department of Justice (DOJ)’s Civil Rights Division together with the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights and Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services has issued joint guidance about the rights of public elementary and secondary students with hearing, vision, or speech disabilities to effective communication. The guidance is intended to help schools, parents, and others understand schools’ obligations under Federal law to meet the communications needs of students with disabilities.                                                                                                             
Public schools must apply both the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) analysis and the Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) effective communication analysis in determining how to meet the communication needs of an IDEA-eligible student with a hearing, vision, or speech disability. While the two often overlap, the Title II effective communication requirement differs from the requirements in the IDEA. While the IDEA requires that schools make available a free appropriate public education (FAPE), the Title II regulations have a specific effective communication requirement for individuals with disabilities. In some instances, in order to comply with Title II, a school may have to provide the student with accommodations that are not required under the IDEA.                                                                                                                        
For example, let’s suppose a male 13-year-old IEP-eligible student has a cochlear implant and relies on lip-reading to communicate with others. For the past three years, he has used FM technology, which consists of a microphone held by the teacher and a receiver that transmits to his implant.  During this time period, he has maintained above average grades, completed grade level work, and interacted appropriately with his peers.                                                                                                 
Recently, however, he stated that he is struggling with hearing others in the classroom. He also stated that the FM system transmitted static and background noises and interfered with his ability to focus.  Based on these concerns, his mother requested that he receive communication access real-time translation (CART) services. Under the IDEA, the services must enable him to receive FAPE. Based on his above average grades, his grade-level work and teachers’ reports on his interactions in class with his peers, the IEP Team could determine that CART is not necessary for him to receive FAPE.                                                                                                                                   
However, under Title II, the school district must take appropriate steps to ensure that communication with that particular student is as effective as communication with students without disabilities. The school must also give primary consideration to the requests made by the student and his parents. In this hypothetical, the student cannot hear many of the other students in the classroom, and by not hearing a student’s question or comment, he does not always understand a teacher’s response.  Based on this, the school’s ADA Coordinator can determine that he is not receiving effective communication and is entitled to CART services.                                                                              
The guidance includes a letter to educators, a Frequently Asked Questions document and a summary Fact Sheet, which can be accessed here:

U.S. Department of Justice – Civil Rights Division

Frequently Asked Questions

Fact Sheet


The Customer Service Promise
The State of Maryland pledges to provide constituents, businesses, customers, and stakeholders with services in the following manner:
  • Friendly and Courteous: We will be helpful and supportive and have a positive attitude and passion for what we do.
  • Timely and Responsive: We will be ​proactive, take initiative, and anticipate your needs.
  • ​Accurate and Consistent: We will always aim for 100% accuracy, and be consistent in how we interpret a​nd implement state policies and procedures.
  • Accessible and Convenient: ​We will continue to simplify and improve access to information and resources.
  • Truthful and Transparent: We will advance a culture of honesty, clarity and trust.

Tell us about your experience with the Office of the Deaf & Hard of Hearing. Click here to complete a three question customer experience survey.

Click here to view our FY19 Customer Service Annual Report.

Close window
Close Disclaimer

Google Translate Disclaimer

The Maryland Department of Information Technology (“DoIT”) offers translations of the content through Google Translate. Because Google Translate is an external website, DoIT does not control the quality or accuracy of translated content. All DoIT content is filtered through Google Translate which may result in unexpected and unpredictable degradation of portions of text, images and the general appearance on translated pages. Google Translate may maintain unique privacy and use policies. These policies are not controlled by DoIT and are not associated with DoIT’s privacy and use policies. After selecting a translation option, users will be notified that they are leaving DoIT’s website. Users should consult the original English content on DoIT’s website if there are any questions about the translated content.

DoIT uses Google Translate to provide language translations of its content. Google Translate is a free, automated service that relies on data and technology ​​​to provide its translations. The Google Translate feature is provided for informational purposes only. Translations cannot be guaranteed as exact or without the inclusion of incorrect or inappropriate language. Google Translate is a third-party service and site users will be leaving DoIT to utilize translated content. As such, DoIT does not guarantee and does not accept responsibility for, the accuracy, reliability, or performance of this service nor the limitations provided by this service, such as the inability to translate specific files like PDFs and graphics (e.g. .jpgs, .gifs, etc.).

DoIT provides Google Translate as an online tool for its users, but DoIT does not directly endorse the website or imply that it is the only solution available to users. All site visitors may choose to use alternate tools for their translation needs. Any individuals or parties that use DoIT content in translated form, whether by Google Translate or by any other translation services, do so at their own risk. DoIT is not liable for any loss or damages arising out of, or issues related to, the use of or reliance on translated content. DoIT assumes no liability for any site visitor’s activities in connection with use of the Google Translate functionality or content.

The Google Translate service is a means by which DoIT offers translations of content and is meant solely for the convenience of non-English speaking users of the website. The translated content is provided directly and dynamically by Google; DoIT has no direct control over the translated content as it appears using this tool. Therefore, in all contexts, the English content, as directly provided by DoIT is to be held authoritative.